Outcome #4
I engaged with their work by first reading without looking for anything that needs to be fixed. As I read it I noted areas that needed to be peer-reviewed. I engaged by looking out for veering off in paragraphs, grammatical mistakes, strong evidence, and if anything seemed to be missing that could add to her essay. This essay was beautifully written and there were only small things that I noticed. I commended, questioned, and suggested for this paper. There was no clarifying for this essay because I found that her sentences and paragraphs had their purpose very clearly stated. Her paragraphs also stayed focused on the points she was making. I suggested some places to change some grammar I noticed. I questioned when I noticed that she mentioned the titles of two essays but not another because I wasn’t sure if that was on purpose or she didn’t notice she had done that. I questioned how her evidence helped support her claims and I noticed that they did. I had mostly commended this essay. She had really hit all the spots and made a beautifully written essay that stayed focused on her strong points and had quotes that supported her claims. This feedback was designed to improve their writing but pointing out small mistakes that she may have missed and to make her feel confident in her writing. Sometimes we miss the small mistakes and I wanted to help her lookout more for those small mistakes. There could be strong arguments but there may be small mistakes that we don’t see as the writer.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
